Health Technology Assessment Policy & Methods Review
12 June 2023
Medications and Treatments
MS Australia submission draws on input from our Member Organisations and welcomes the HTA Review, advocating for improved access to health technologies for people with MS. The submission emphasises person-centred reforms, consumer engagement, equitable clinical trial access, and financial incentives for trials. Recommendations include better communication with health organizations, a patient registry, and compensating consumer involvement. The goal is timely, safe, high-quality, and affordable healthcare access.
MS Australia is writing to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) in support of the request to include ocrelizumab (Ocrevus®) via subcutaneous (SC) delivery on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) for the treatment of people living with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).
MS Australia is writing to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) in support of the request to include ublituximab (Briumvi®) on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) for the treatment of people living with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (MS).Â
MS Australia’s 2025-26 Pre-Budget Submission advocates for strategic investments to support over 33,300 Australians living with MS. Key funding asks include $8M for a National MS Biobank, $300M for a Neurological Research Mission, and $550K for neurological data improvements; $6.5M to expand MS nursing services, a national strategy, and training programs; Improved NDIS pricing, workforce, assistive technology, and income support; and Increased funding for disability-specific aged care services.
MS Australia’s submission on the second round of NDIS Act amendments supports enhanced statutory duties for providers and key personnel, emphasising accountability and the need for guidance, training, and clarity. It endorses stronger penalties but urges proportionality and clear definitions. Anti-promotion orders, expanded banning categories, and data storage rules are welcomed with caveats. The recommendations focus on balancing safeguarding participants with practical provider considerations.
